
The origins of the universe? How droll. I’m still waiting on news about whether the missing link is still missing. Now that’s news most people can at least understand.
In a rare moment of … of … Oh I can’t explain it. I was reading the newspaper. I really try not to do that kind of thing. And this is why.
I saw the following headline, “Scientists help unravel secret of universe’s existence.” Kind of eye-catching, huh?
I figured since this article was in our local newspaper that a person of normal intelligence could read and, probably more importantly, understand the big secret about who or what birthed the universe.
I was in luck because I am a person of above normal intelligence, although science was never my best subject in school. This is how a smart girl gets through science class:
1. make friends with the geeky science genius who is stunned, but more than happy to be your lab and study partner
2, volunteer to help the science teacher before, during and after class (teachers’ pets are often thrown a bone or can talk their way into “extra credit” assignments that geeky science genius will help with)
I figured I must have absorbed some scientific intelligence just by spending so much time with science teachers and geeky geniuses. I think the process is calls osmosis. Impressed? I am.
So I felt confident that I could read this article and discuss it with the 2 other people I may someday encounter who also read and understood it. We would have a humdinger of a conversation. People around us would be awestruck and confused at the same time. I love it when that happens.
As I began reading, my hallucinations dreams of being a brilliant Scientologist science-savvy blonde withered away.
I was okay with the first sentence, which basically summarized the title of the article, but then stuck in the words “physicists” and “particle.” I began doing that pouty thing with my lips that can look sexy in the proper setting, but usually looks as if I’m having trouble finding my car.
The second sentence was just unfair. I think they were making up words to see if readers were paying attention. And I quote, “…for the first time, a muon neutrino was seen transformed into and electron neutrino–something never witnessed before.” I’m sure it hasn’t been. Why? Because someone just made up the word “muon” and it isn’t even that great for a made up word. May I suggest mutalon? glomatron? amutoid?
Then the article blathered on about how neutrinos have counterparts called anti-neutrinos, which is just plain copying what science fiction writers made up years ago, when they mentioned matter and anti-matter in their plots.
Apparently these good and evil twins can and do behave differently, causing life and death and really big explosions.
The Big Bang Theory, Star Trek, and Dan Brown’s “Angels and Demons” were all mentioned in the article. No kidding. They all used anti-matter to power their plots or star ships or what have you. I understood that part.

I’m tellin’ ya, Cap’ain. Dilithiam Crystals are just anti-matter. We had ta call ’em somethin’ fancy soundin’ fer the audience–ta make it sound like we’re travelin’ on a real make believe star ship. Folks would never believe the ole girl is run on anti-matter. It sounds like she runs on nothin’! There’s somethin’ the matter with that, Sir. I know, it’s confusin’. Just find a blonde alien and leave the engines ta me.
Then, right after the Star Trek part that I understood, the article had to go and confuse me again. It stated, “In the T2K experiment, scientists created muon neutrinos with a particle accelerator at a facility on the east coast of Japan and shot a beam of them through the ground.”
You would think there would be a law against muon neutrino beam shooting. But I suppose anything goes in Japan.

These women don’t look happy. They look anti-happy. Could they be victims of a drive by muon neutrino shooting?
The article goes on, “Three hundred kilometers at the other side of the country, the neutrinos were observed in a massive detector called the Super-Kamiokande.”
And they expect me to believe that? Some scientist shoots mythical invisible things through the ground and gets readings from supposedly the same invisible things on an instrument that sounds like it’s the next big sensation in every bar for anyone who loves to sing, but can’t. Yeah, right.
So, I asked myself, how does all these shooting particles and shape-shifting neutrinos help solve the mystery of how the universe got to be the universe?
The lead scientist on this project is quoted in the final part of the article. So I’m thinking he has the answer to where the universe came from.
Silly me.
“There are a family of particles, and by studying one you can sort of infer some of the properties of the others in the family,” he said. “And it’s actually other members of the family that we believe are responsible for this imbalance in the universe.” Wha-ha-ha-t? Families of particles? And some of the family members are imbalanced?
I was, as you can probably tell, a smidge disappointed. How did the universe begin? Heck if I know. Does it matter? Does it anti-matter?
I know one thing from reading this article that I didn’t know before: the Japanese have a Super-Kamiokande and I want to know if my voice sounds Super-Better when I sing into it.











Aug 11, 2013 @ 12:50:26
I know the feeling (about less time to review sites). Oh well. I do the best I can…
Aug 09, 2013 @ 11:51:34
Well some may disagree…but you and my mom now make two people I know of who have said that to me!
That’s very nice of you to say, Lorna. I wish I had time to look over more of my reader’s sites, but I can see less time for that in the future.
But I’ll do the best I can. Enjoy your day and we’ll talk again soon.
Christian
Aug 08, 2013 @ 13:57:25
That’s a wonderful aspiration, Christian. The world needs lots more people like you… 🙂
Aug 08, 2013 @ 11:42:27
Well I can certainly agree with THAT statement! I would be concerned with things in this world except it seems there has been “bad” or “evil” at a high level since Cain and Abel!
My true desire is simple. “Five” offers helpful information on a variety of topics in order to encourage people to challenge themselves, and to become even better than they already may be!
Obviously, Lorna, you seem to be “cut from the same cloth.” I appreciate your website and thank you for your reply…
Enjoy your day,
Christian
Aug 08, 2013 @ 10:10:46
I loved psychology–almost had enough credits for a minor. I have a counseling Master’s degree, but went back to sociology for my PhD. People just fascinate me. The problem is, the more I learn about them, the more they confuse me. 😉
Aug 07, 2013 @ 12:27:34
🙂
Christian
Aug 07, 2013 @ 12:22:06
I studied psychology in school and wanted to become a counselor. However, I never followed through beyond two years.
It’s interesting to see and learn about people. I’ve become even more interested in the talents which we all have and chose to display.
Thank you, Lorna, for the reply and enjoy your day. Stop in anytime…
Christian 🙂
Aug 06, 2013 @ 14:45:13
I’m a sociologist by training. I can’t be pithy. It’s against our professional code of conduct! 😉
Hey thanks for stopping by and commenting. Always much appreciated! 🙂
Aug 06, 2013 @ 14:43:25
Thanks!
Aug 06, 2013 @ 14:42:53
I bet there’s lots of good blog material in there, too…
Aug 06, 2013 @ 14:41:54
Well, I am a social scientist. In some circles, that counts! 😉
Aug 05, 2013 @ 20:55:30
Tee hee … “How did the universe begin? Heck if I know. Does it matter? Does it anti-matter?” Priceless.
Lorna, I can never concentrate on what you’re saying for how you say it. Hey, maybe you really are a scientist x
Aug 05, 2013 @ 17:45:47
You’re just reading the wrong periodicals. Do like I do and just read “Us”: lots of colorful pictures of important people, like the Kardashians, and no words bigger than 2 syllables.
Aug 03, 2013 @ 21:56:54
That’s *entertaining! Sorry…
Aug 03, 2013 @ 21:55:28
This is super! Very funny and intertwining. I love the t-shirt which says “I love science. That is all.” Why use 1,000 words when 8-10 will do? Great job.
Christian
Aug 03, 2013 @ 14:16:50
You summed it up nicely. I wish I’d thought of that!
Aug 02, 2013 @ 22:36:35
I only have one word for all of this…yikes.
Aug 02, 2013 @ 10:42:47
🙂
Aug 02, 2013 @ 10:42:32
What amused me most was that I bet the reporter didn’t understand what he wrote any more than I understood what I read. 🙂
Aug 02, 2013 @ 10:41:12
I think you’re on to something there. Some things are best left to admire, not dissect. A night time sky is as good an example as I can come up with! 🙂 Neutrinos, indeed…
Aug 01, 2013 @ 17:38:22
I used to in my youth lay on the grass looking into the night sky, and all the stars. Trying to discuss with a friend, say, the shapes they allegedly made, and try to imagine what we see, there is more beyond, and more beyond that, infinity,, but sure it has to stop somewhere. I started smoking pot after this,, atleast I had a rational reason for my mentality, or was it insanity. nice read again,, I think??? 😉
Aug 01, 2013 @ 14:40:20
As usual, you turned a boring subject, and article which thankfully I didn’t have to read, into a rollicking, smile and chuckle loaded read. Thanks. 🙂
Aug 01, 2013 @ 13:14:27
I agree…not a good place to be shaking things up.
Aug 01, 2013 @ 13:04:21
Kudos to you for trying to make sense out of all of this. I think the reporter was way over his head, though. 😉
Aug 01, 2013 @ 13:02:49
Well, I’m there right along with you. And I don’t think the reporter understood it either. 😉
Aug 01, 2013 @ 12:09:42
I once dated a physicist. Bad idea.
Aug 01, 2013 @ 12:07:31
I loved your post but these type things confuse the hell out of me…
Aug 01, 2013 @ 11:51:28
You should have written the article, Al. 🙂
Aug 01, 2013 @ 11:50:29
I like that one, too–it was easy to understand and write, unlike the rest of the post! 😉
Aug 01, 2013 @ 11:49:47
Don’t you just love a good particle physics lesson? Best cure for insomnia I know!
Aug 01, 2013 @ 11:48:37
Yes, I was. That was a real article ostensibly about the key to the origins of the universe. It has something to to with these muon neutrinos that, when shot into a super-collider in Japan, changed into anti-neutrinos. I think the anti-neutrinos (like anti-matter) are highly combustive and may be somehow linked to the “Big Bang” (not the TV show but the thing that got the universe jump started). It was very confusing for an article in our local hometown newspaper that usually carries stories about whose pig won best in show at the County Fair. Of course I interjected my own humor, but the quotes were real. That’s what made it so funny to me. 🙂
Aug 01, 2013 @ 11:42:25
Sounds too risky to me–especially after all the problems they’ve had with tsunamis, earth quakes, and such…
Jul 31, 2013 @ 23:38:29
I still don’t think the Japanese should go shooting beams into the ground…
Jul 31, 2013 @ 22:42:15
What the Hell are they talking about… and then you attempt to enlighten me as well… now I’m totally confused about everything… thanks for the laugh as usual… I do enjoy your sense of humour, you weren’t being serious here were you??
Jul 31, 2013 @ 20:57:29
zzzzzzzzzz. Finally a good snooze. U’ve cured me. Wuv you!
Jul 31, 2013 @ 20:40:19
“Did it matter? Did it anti-matter.” My very favorite line!
Jul 31, 2013 @ 17:54:50
It’s really quite simple, Lorna. In the beginning, the fosnoid formatron collided with the densomablaster which caused the remikals to have a chain reactions with the semisonic particulators. Hence the Big Bang. However, since no one was there to hear it, there was no sound.
Jul 31, 2013 @ 17:07:02
I’m not going to pretend that I understood any of it, but I did like the Science is Awesome t-shirt.
Jul 31, 2013 @ 16:17:56
I read an article on neutrino’s recently in an old Smithsonian. I enjoyed the pictures of the things they built to trap them but don’t test me on this. And my undergraduate degree is in science.