And I don’t know why you would (wanna talk about hoarders), but here goes.
Since last week’s brouhaha about the SOPA/PIPA Act, which is now dead. Details about the burial are forthcoming in the BTA Act (Bury the Act) Act, which doesn’t happen very often in Congress so someone has to wake up a bunch of Representatives and/or their mistresses…escorts…partners…spouses…help). This got me thinking–always a risky venture for me. Thinking. About politics. And things in general.

I wonder if the bling is too much. Other children at the daycare won't have such fancy scarves. They may feel inadequate. These feelings may follow them throughout their lives and they could act out their repressed resentments by running for public office and creating regulations against wearing blingy scarves to daycare. It could happen.
I wondered just how many federal regulations (FEDREGS) we have in America. Guess what? It’s a secret. It’s not a secret like in who’s a spy and who’s not? Someone knows that information; they just won’t tell (unless it’s politically expeditious to do so, right Val Plame?). It’s a secret because the number of FEDREGS is simply too complex to count. No one, and I mean nobody, can give a straight answer (or the same answer) to the number of FEDREGS that affect our lives either directly or indirectly…or both. Definitely not neither.
The following is only information about pages of FEDREGS, not actual numbers of regulations. Pages, apparently, are easier for government officials to report on than the regulations the pages are about. If you understand anything about our government, this should make perfect sense to you. If you understand nothing about our government, welcome to the 99%.
In 1998, Office of the Federal Register reported that the Code of Federal Regulations *(CFR), the official listing of all regulations in effect at that time, contained a total of 134,723 pages in 201 volumes that claimed 19 feet of shelf space, but the size of the shelves was undisclosed. In 1970, the CFR totaled only 54,834 pages. The CFR could probably fit on one good sturdy small Ikea book shelf, but it would have to be made in America.
*This site is no longer being updated. No big deal. It only gives you information on specific regulations, not the total number.
[20 minute intermission to do some basic calculations and ask someone to take a few shots of whiskey just to calm me down]
I’m back. In 1998, or 28 years later, the U.S. government collected 245.7% more pages of regulations because nearly 55 thousand pages of regulations in 1970 weren’t enough. If we make an insane a simple assumption that the regulation-page hoarding-rate remained constant over the last 14 years and if we are ultra conservative (even though we know all bloggers are hopelessly liberal) and halve the rate of regulatory page hoarding because it’s 14 years not 28 years…are you still with me?… we should have about…
[20 minute intermission for more calculations, praying, and vicarious drinking]
Alrighty then. 165,705.29. That’s the number of pages of U.S. FEDREGS currently weighing down about 27 feet of shelf space in almost 300 volumes of FEDREGS in some mythical place where the aliens are kept. Please remember to factor in the ever popular margin of error, which, in this case, is +165,705.29 and a -3.29.
If we (and by “we” I mean “I”) were talking about magazines, plastic bags (or paper if you prefer), shoes, trolls, chia pet gardens, empty pizza boxes, dead goldfish, or live cats, we’d be sending in the Dynamic Duo of Oprah and Dr. Phil in for a major public intervention. But this is the Congress of United States of America we’re talking about. We can’t have our regulation-hoarding representatives exposed and embarrassed. Again.
What would the neighbors think? And What about us–the voters? Our tax dollars (and by “our” I mean anyone who isn’t avoiding paying taxes by using an expensive lawyers who know how to work the tax code, which is about 4,000,000 million words long–I swear on a stack of 5 Bibles) are paying the salaries of these FEDREG-hoarders. If we went to the Capitol and looked into the windows, what would we see?

We need a regulation to cover the windows of every Federal building. Citizens, ahem, terrorists might be peeking in.
I’ve never been one to complain without offering a solution. It’s not polite. And I don’t think going all Oprah/Dr. Phil Tag Team on anyone, even the Congress, is a humane solution to any problem–unless you (and by “you” I mean “you”) are talking about people who pick their nose in public. Those people are gross.
I think that for every new FEDREG that gets proposed, some old FEDREG should be tossed. Recycle the paper. Maybe offer the regulation to a country that might want or need it. Donating used things always feels so good.
I even have a suggestion to start with.
U.S. Code Sec. 2074. False weather reports: You can be fined and imprisoned for 3 months for knowingly broadcasting a false weather report. I know how important the weather is to a lot of people, but I seriously doubt that criminal minds are so bored as to hijack a green room and orchestrate a pretend weather forecast.

See the white puffy clouds? You can't miss them. Well, sorry, you will miss them when Ms. D-Cup is arrested for misleading her male audience into thinking white puffy clouds covered the Western quarter of the country.
I’m sure there are many more arcane regulations that can be scrapped as new, more invasive…relevant…invasive regulations are conjured in the hallowed halls of Congress. If they (and by “they” I mean “Them”) don’t do something to pare down the incalculable number of rules we all have to live by (well, 99% of us have to live by), then we (and by “we” I mean the entertainment industry) will have to get all Oprah/Dr. Phil on their collective butts.











Jan 29, 2012 @ 16:24:40
My rule for closets and drawers, shelf space and storage? For every one item in or on, two must go out. Govregs should be so diligent. 🙂
Jan 27, 2012 @ 11:14:02
I never thought of the mass of regulations being a source of “job creators.” 😉 You’re always thinking!
Jan 26, 2012 @ 21:08:37
Maybe there could be some new jobs–to read the FEDREGS and rewrite them so they can be easily understood. Their motto could be “making sense out of chaos.” Just think of all the new jobs that would be available. Wonder if this would reduce the number of pages? I can see a reworded regulation that has shrunk from 10 pages to 8 words. Something like: “Stop being stupid and do the right thing!”
Oh well, wishful thinking. Guess I’ll just continue to read your blog and see what happens.
Jan 26, 2012 @ 14:16:49
I hear you. Thanks for the reply! It’s got to be frustrating working with these regulations and having to hear people complain about them who don’t work with them!
Jan 26, 2012 @ 14:15:12
Thought you’d like that, Androgoth… 😉
Jan 25, 2012 @ 17:37:44
Those weather girls are
just too naughty me thinks? 😉
A wicked offering Lorna and
do have a delightful Thursday 🙂
Androgoth XXx
Jan 25, 2012 @ 16:01:02
New ones come every day, actually. Old ones get repealed everyday. In the Federal Register.
They are complicated and cumbersome, which is one of the reasons why smart people should be in charge or writing and enforcing them. The GOP anti-regulation mantra drives me crazy — they just want to be in charge of the hen-house. What we need is SMART honest folks in the government. Because, actually, government is NOT the problem.
Jan 25, 2012 @ 14:36:23
Zing! I deserved that. 😉
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:27:55
We’re supposed to have an “open government” and we have websites that display legislation under consideration (except the federal, which is not being updated), but a person could spend 24-7 on the web trying to get informed and still never catch up. I spent a lot of time researching for this post. I was stunned at the number of bills under consideration in New York State alone (I can’t remember the number, but it was pages and pages of bills).
Kill them with information and maybe they’ll go away. That must be the motto of our “open government.”
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:17:03
Hey now! Are you trying to regulate my thoughts? 😀
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:16:11
Oh, I found a list of arcane state laws that would blow you away…
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:15:08
Yes, there is a law about intentionally making false weather reports–probably so as not to start a panic or something. It probably happened once in 1901 and a federal law was passed. No one knows about it (well, anyone who read the post does), so I doubt this law has any teeth in terms of preventing people from doing it. And how does one know that the false report (which happens all the time) was unintentional? Weather people may want to get back at their viewing public for blaming them for the weather…It could happen.
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:10:20
I’m all out of ideas, Diana. I have to go back to writing about my life (where I don’t have to make anything up).
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:09:24
I think you should be in charge of this new agency. I’ll be your Under Secretary. And stop thinking what you’re thinking…
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:07:46
I have to do something different, just to rattle my cage!
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:06:15
You and, oh, about 99% of us (or is it U.S.)? 😉
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:05:29
Best no to think about these things in a prone position… 😉
Jan 25, 2012 @ 11:04:25
Of course we have to have regulations! But, tell me, since you work with them, how the heck many of them are there? I could not find that info anywhere and I looked a good long time. How can people keep track of all these regulations and do they? Can they be simplified?
My fiance works with environmental issues for a local industry. He is well-acquainted with the CFR website and software to help him with the regs and reporting. He understands the need for the regulations, but is also frustrated by new regulations that seem to duplicate current ones or, worse, contradict current ones. Is there a critical mass after which the number of regs become ineffective due to their sheer volume?
Enough. I must return to my whipper-snapper self, too!
Thanks for commenting, Elyse. I understand where you’re coming from. Really, I do.
Jan 25, 2012 @ 10:54:59
Thanks so much for stopping in and commenting. Regulation misery loves company! 🙂
Jan 25, 2012 @ 10:53:25
All that math was kind of meant to befuddle the reader because the whole thing befuddled me!
Jan 25, 2012 @ 10:47:57
As I was researching this, I found lots of quotes by House and Senate Members who bemoaned the sheer volume of the tax code alone. I know I’m not the only one to complain. That’s a good thing! I still wish I could get an answer on the number of regs we have and not just the pages of regs based on a 1998 study.
Jan 25, 2012 @ 09:50:17
Good blog, Lorna, done with your usual incisive wit and graphics. However, not to put you down, but Nancy Pelosi already put a face on this ridiculous government problem with her now famous comment about the Obamacare bill; to wit: “We’ll have to pass it to find out what’s in it.” I’m still trying to pick my jaw up off the floor from that one.
Jan 25, 2012 @ 00:47:54
Oooops lotza this ‘n that about regs went right over m’head Lorna – but then I was the founding president of the low IQ Club when I worked for Dun & Bradstreet. That bookcase is great, am going to get my nephew to make one, he’s mighty handy with carpentry stuff, cheers catchul8r molly
Jan 25, 2012 @ 00:18:55
Interesting and informative. BTW I live in Delhi, India. The other day my wife and I were talking about a new regulation enacted by the city specifying that schools can only begin at 9 AM or later. And we wondered if they don’t have better things to regulate, like reducing crime, catching traffic violators, etc. Why bother about children’s school timings ? The answer we came up with was “regulate what you can”. Perhaps crime is too big to tackle, so let us enact a law about something to show we are alive and kicking.Comforting to know that we are not the only suffereres at the hands of overzealous legislators.
Jan 24, 2012 @ 20:32:02
Oh dear. I am a regulatory DWEEB. I understand them. I read them, I analyze them. I get them. I even know where they are.
Yup, there are a lot of them. Know why? Because when industries are not regulated they cheat. Think Country-wide. Think about those smoke stacks down the road. Think about whether you want somebody figuring out that maybe cows with BSE shouldn’t be sold at Safeway.
Next time I promise to be my normal smart-alack self in my comments. But I gotta say that you gotta have them.
Jan 24, 2012 @ 19:07:19
I must be part of the 99% because I don’t understand any of this. I don’t even want to try. It would be too depressing and I’m sure there’s a FEDREGG against that!! Enjoy always, unless it’s not allowed. Although I think we’re still entitled to the ‘pursit of happiness’, we just not allowed to actually obtain it. . . whatever. Never mind me, I fell down and I can’t get up.
Jan 24, 2012 @ 16:53:00
Words can’t even describe the frustration I feel towards our government. 😦
Jan 24, 2012 @ 16:33:03
Seconding Sylvia for the thanks on the peek into “your” government. I dread to think what ours has hoarded. Perhaps like SOPA and PIPA some things are best left dead. Still, who knows what they’ll try next.
Hope someone who can actually do something on the green idea reads this. Sadly, it’s usually down to job preservation from suits on up. Oh, I digress. Thanks for the read.
This was different from reading about your colourful life experiences but enjoyed your brain in motion as always, soul sister, some good thinking aloud and great points in print, well, in text, lol. 🙂
Jan 24, 2012 @ 16:18:35
Brilliant idea Lorna.
We just need to pass a regulation that regulates the passage of regulations, and then a few regulations that address the procedure in regulating the passage of regulations, and of course regulations governing the elimination of regulations, especially if enjoined to the regulations governing the passage of new regulations. Lastly, we will need to create an agency that oversees all the regulatory matters of regulating the regulations…
Jan 24, 2012 @ 15:33:14
I love the idea of getting rid of one FEDREG before another can be introduced. Then again, it makes way too much sense to even be considered. Sensible and efficient doesn’t mix well with governmental BS. You’ll have to think of something else.
Jan 24, 2012 @ 14:40:11
I think you’re plan sounds as sane as any. Is it really true that you can be fined for giving out dodgy weather reports? That wouldn’t work in our country, all the weather folks have to do in Scotland is say that it will be raining. That way they’re usually right and if they’re not we’re all just too happy about it to prosecute. 😆
Jan 24, 2012 @ 13:27:13
Wow. I’m bothered by almost everything, but this one slipped by me. I can only imagine some of the obscure regulations that are out there. Maybe you should see if you could dig up some more regulations (I loved the weather one), and entertain us with another one of your great posts.
Jan 24, 2012 @ 12:36:11
Thanks Sylvia! No government is perfect, but ours seems especially imperfect… 😦
Jan 24, 2012 @ 12:22:00
Thanks for an enlightening and entertaining post about your (and by ‘your’ I mean ‘your’) government. Sounds muddled–much like our (and by ‘our’ I mean ‘my’) Canadian counterpart. Quite the mess, for sure. Most people only become aware of a regulation if and when it begins to affect something they do or want to do…I like your idea of recycling old regs–that way the government would set a good example of being green! Great idea.