“Freaking psychopath!”
I’ve said that a lot lately when people tell me about encounters they’ve had with obnoxious, unpleasant, or freaking psychopathic people. You may be wondering:
Isn’t she Buddhist and not supposed to be so judgmental? Well, you’ve got me there. But Buddhism is a very forgiving practice, so when I fall off the Serenity Train, I can always hop on again after I wallow in the muck of judgement. So if you’re judging me, I forgive me. I forgive you, too.
Is she qualified to diagnose people like that? Yes and no. Well, no. But I just read a book called The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson and I’m confident that I can ferret out the crack-pots among us now that I’ve read the book. It’s not hard; they’re everywhere. Maybe some most all psychologists would disagree with my psycho-spotting capabilities, but look at whose disagreeing with me: psychologists. If you’ve got the word “psycho” in your job title, think twice about being high and mighty about anything, which is a sign that you’re a psychopath, by the way. See how much I learned from this book?
My goal is simple: to scare the begeebers out of you help you, too, become a psycho-spotter. Of course you could read the book, but why confuse yourself with facts?
In a nutshell (good pun, eh?), a brilliant checklist-loving doctor, Robert Hare, created a 20-item checklist: the Psychopathology Checklist Revised (PCL-R). If a person is crazy enough to submit to this test, that’s one sign s/he is a psychopath. Not really; but you’d think that should be factored into the score.
Scores range from 0 (Mother Theresa) to 40 (name your favorite psychopath), but a score of 30 qualifies you to be sent to a nice farm in the country where you can frolic. No. Wait. That’s where parents tell their kids pets go when they’re really going to the pound. Score 30+ on the PCL-R and you’re effectively going to the pound.

Conspicuous frolicking. The electrified barbed wire fences are out of view. So are the armed guards.
For each item on the checklist, the psycho person is given a score from “0” to “2.”
- “0” means “Heavens no! I’m appalled you’d even suggest such a thing. I feel a case of the vapors coming on. Hand me my smell salts.” (Translation: does not apply.)
- “1” means “Yeah, kinda sorta. Ya know, a person’s got certain scratches at certain times dat, ya know, just gotta be itched. Or is it da udder way around? Anyhow. Yeah. I guess so. Sometimes, anyway.” (Translation: applies somewhat. This is a grey area that can get people in a great deal of
incarcerationtrouble, as you’ll note when you see the PCL-R items, some of which leave little room for “kinda sorta.”) - “2” means “Yup, that’s me and I’m darned proud of it. Just ask any of my fellow inmates/Congressmen/stockholders/actors. It’s special people like us that make the world great.” (Translation: fully applies.)
These are the 20 traits that psychopaths have:
- Glibness/superficial charm (good at party small-talk or hiding something nefarious with a smile and a wink?)
- Grandiose sense of self-worth (really has saved the whales or believes the whales should migrate to his/her feet and blow in unison to pay homage to their savior?)
- Need for stimulation/prone to boredom (Sitting for 2 hours in Professor Snoozekoffer’s lecture on the life cycle of a worm or complains there’s nothing to in Las Vegas?)
- Pathological lying (exaggerating to make a blog lively or telling the police the blood in your car trunk is from unfortunately heavy menstruation?)
- Conning/manipulative (guilt-tripping a friend into anything or being devious enough to impress Bernie Madoff.)
- Lack of remorse or guilt (I’m sorry, I envy psychopaths on this trait.)
- Shallow affect (emotions) (pretend crying at a funeral of someone you hate or not needing tissues during any movie scene in which the dog dies.)
- Callous/lack of empathy (parent watching child have 10th tantrum in 2 hours or smiling while watching aforementioned parent?)
- Parasitic lifestyle (20-something child asking parents for cash or 50-something child living with 70-something parents who still do “child’s” laundry?)
- Poor behavioral controls (slamming a door or slamming your car into the side of your house?)
- Promiscuous sexual behavior (Define “promiscuous.” If it’s sex with many partners without emotional involvement, then okay. Otherwise, leave me alone.)
- Early behavior problems (incessant hair twirling or experiments with live animals that don’t turn well for the once live animal?)
- Lack of realistic long-term goals (getting a book published or having Meg Ryan play me in the movie version?)
- Impulsiveness (impulse-buying Cosmopolitan because it has 100 “secrets” to great sex or impulse-robbing a bank just because?)
- Irresponsibility (driving too fast or letting your 10-year-old drive too fast?)
- Failure to accept responsibility for ones own actions (victim of a messed up childhood or those corpses didn’t need that jewelry in the coffin, so I took it–what’s the big deal?)
- Many short-term marital relationships (repeated bad judge of character or a Kardashian?)
- Juvenile delinquency*
- Revocation of conditional release* (recidivism)
- Criminal versatility*
* (How can “somewhat applies apply? Either it does or it doesn’t.)
So now you know. People who you once thought merely annoying you can now label “freaking psychopaths,” but I’d do it behind their backs or at least just mutter it under your breath.
DISCLAIMER: I wrote this post for fun. People who are mentally ill need serious help. Trained professionals dedicated to helping them, like Dr. Hare, have their (and our) best interests in mind. Hopefully. The point of Ronson’s book and my post is to get us thinking about the line between sanity and insanity. Who defines the line and what happens when it’s crossed?
Heady stuff…







Feb 28, 2012 @ 17:39:30
Corporate psychopaths – they are still occupying positions of power « Talesfromthelou's Blog
Dec 29, 2011 @ 07:50:34
Dec 19, 2011 @ 09:29:30
Everyone has elements of some of these qualities. That you didn’t run over that guy (and I would’ve had the same impulse, by the way), shows that you do have impulse control and empathy, so you’re fine, T!
Dec 18, 2011 @ 09:46:28
I and 20 of my closest friends share these traits but I never want to kill anyone…well that’s not true there was this guy I saw kicking a dog…I wanted to run him over with my car only because he was so much bigger than me…yet I’m no bad man, just a good pirate…. 😉
T.
Dec 05, 2011 @ 11:37:05
Thanks, Jeanna. I had fun with this one, as I’m sure you could tell…
Dec 05, 2011 @ 11:07:34
Ahh the first post of yours I have been fortunate enough to read in awhile… is it karma that it happened to be this one? lol. We’ll go with no for right now. 🙂 So well written, I love how funny you are. You’re posts are starting to just really ROCK GIRL!!!!
Nov 27, 2011 @ 12:19:24
Yep, definitely my ex in there. Around 15 out of 20. I’m the other five.
Nov 23, 2011 @ 12:01:17
Absolutely true. They will think something is wrong with the rest of the world, just not them. Scary.
Nov 22, 2011 @ 16:16:45
Psychopaths are terrifying, as they can be brilliant and appear charming. And a true psychopath will never get help as they will never believe anything is wrong with them.
Nov 22, 2011 @ 07:17:18
Yeah. Gotta be careful with those gifts and what people assume. I once gave a nice basket of bath products and the receiver got insulted, thinking I was giving her a message that she needed to pay more attention to her hygiene!
Nov 22, 2011 @ 07:15:46
No. He focuses on adult behavior, mostly. There are a few passages that deal with behavior as children, but Ronson doesn’t go in depth about that aspect. I was referred to “The Sociopath Next Door.” That book might address childhood behavior, but I haven’t read it…yet.
Nov 22, 2011 @ 02:57:36
Just a little light reading, Lorna? Please tell me that most people would spot a person with these characteristics and walk the other way. Oh yah, they’re charming, aren’t they?
I could give this as a Christmas gift to a few women friends as an aid, but then they’d think I was suggesting they are psychopaths! How to win friends…
Nov 21, 2011 @ 20:36:35
Great recap Lorna. Does the book talk in depth about psychopaths as children?
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:53:11
Yes, thanks so very much! I saw that on your blog this morning. Thanks for posting the link here.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:47:27
I nominated you for the Liebster Blog Award. Follow the link below to see the rules and share the love. http://narcissistsblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/liebster-blog-award/
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:45:10
Oh dear, oh d-d-d-dear, dear, dear, dear (in the immortal words of Piglet). 😦
Come to think of it, so did I (although I don’t know about his juvenile or adult criminal record).
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:43:57
Glad to hear it and wouldn’t have believed it if you said you were! 😉
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:43:07
Yes, a checklist makes it “simple” to diagnose a complex set of behavioral and emotional issues. It’s alluring and dangerous. That is the message of the book and the post.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:39:59
Laughing, chuckling, and giggling, Al. Now put the fly down and slowly step away before anyone get hurts. 😉
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:38:45
Smile and nod. Wise advice from a wise woman.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:37:49
Yes, it would also help if you are just a touch sociopathic and telepathic, too. 😉
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:36:48
You’re so right. That is a much trickier business, isn’t it?
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:35:52
That book is mentioned in this book. I may have to take a break, but I’d like to read it, too. Not being one either judge people well (they all seem nice to me) or live in fear, I may be BIG trouble! Of course, I have my big former Marine who’d risk life and limb to protect me… 🙂
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:30:40
We all have at least a couple of these traits. That’s the point of this book and this post. Where’s the line between sane and insane?
Glad you liked the post. 🙂
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:23:26
I’ll say. I meant it when I said this book was an eye-opener. But also it talks about our propensity to over-diagnosis because of checklists like this.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:22:04
You’re still ok, because poor self-knowledge is not one of the 20 items! 😉
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:21:15
Wise woman, Ursula. Wise woman.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:20:21
I’ve been known to consult on graduate theses, but doing data analysis, not psycho-spotting! Glad you liked this post. 🙂
Nov 21, 2011 @ 17:18:50
A dubious honor, indeed! 🙂
Nov 21, 2011 @ 15:35:31
Girl count me in your lesson. Love this line: “I’m confident that I can ferret out the crack-pots among us now that I’ve read the book. It’s not hard; they’re everywhere.”
I now give you the title of “Psycho Expert.”
Nov 21, 2011 @ 11:26:31
Sooooo, can you please write my Masters thesis for me? You’re good at this analysis stuff, and I apparently am overdue for checking in to the closest looney bin. I would still want to graduate though. So, my thesis? What do you think?
Loved this post!!!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 11:17:04
Lorna, such a pity you had to bring up this subject today of all days. Only this morning – on account of weird dreams the last few nights – I told the Angel (over breakfast) that I am ready when he is.
Your list reads like a pick and mix; three for the price of four. The one that particularly appeals to me is the parasitic lifestyle: Why do you think there are no cockroaches in my abode?
U
Nov 21, 2011 @ 08:41:00
I think I may be Ok but that may be just a case of poor sef knowledge.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 08:26:15
Holy cow … they walk among us …. Eeeeekkkk ..!!!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 04:40:04
I like your disclaimer – that was decent of you because, yes, there are mentally ill out there.
But this was a great piece – can’t believe there are 20 traits, but I’m still left wondering HOW MANY MINIMUM make one a psychopath. Alas, I had a couple of the traits! Great piece – it made me smile – and love the b/w photo.
Nov 21, 2011 @ 01:12:51
It’s funny, I quickly started thinking of my ex-husband (veering off of me) when reading down the list here. Truly, he’s in trouble. But I knew this after I read the book “The Sociopath Next Door” –you may be interested in this one too, Lorna.
I agree, I think we’re surrounded by them! 😉
Nov 20, 2011 @ 21:24:43
Thanks for the info, Lorna, but spotting psychos is easy because there are so many of them (us?). I need to know how to spot a normal person.
Nov 20, 2011 @ 20:57:10
Huh, pretty sure I’m a psycho, but I feel it helps my credibility as an artist.
Nov 20, 2011 @ 19:28:24
Yes ma’am, it certainly is heady stuff. That’s why, in my line of work, I try to talk with and listen to everyone I meet. No need to tick-off someone who’s on the verge of a breakdown! We have a large mental hospital in our town and without question I’ve run into more than one person who, from the looks of your test, would/could be defined as freakin’-psychopath. A friend who also works around the same people I do has the solution: smile and nod.
Nov 20, 2011 @ 19:23:31
Thanks for the heads up on this. I’m glad to say I passed the test with flying colors. Now if you’ll excuse me, there’s a fly that needs it wings torn off heh, heh, heh, heh, heh, heh……….
Nov 20, 2011 @ 15:52:18
I love this list, Lorna! Why wouldn’t I? I’m in it somewhere. We all are, whether we like it or not, at least one number applies, I’m sure, LOL. Loving the new label we can now assign PWPUO (People who p*ss us off) LOL
Borrowing a book from a friend who just read about the different functions of the brain. I think, from my conversation with her, that there are some links and a lot of similarities to what you say. Gotta love those text book tests. They are akin to looking up your symptoms online and that’s it, definitive internet diagnosis, no need for a doctor, self treatment via whining to others seems to cure all until the next ailment strikes, lol. (not to say internet research doesn’t have a good place in our lives, only that some rely on it all too much and I just heard they are making the kids in a local high school use text books only again, as we once did, love it)
Definitions, well…like real estate in this world, definitions of any term/label are usually all entirely relative. Yours, mine, former or the 6th removed person in the mirror. LOL It’s particularly all relative when we discuss multiples because my name is really not Lucy.
Love ya’ wise, witty woman 🙂
Yours,
Sybil
PS
Thanks for my Sunday funny bone awakening, great breakfast reading 🙂
I hear a new book calling my names, gotta go LOL xo
Nov 20, 2011 @ 15:23:48
Thank goodness! I’m not a psychopath. A little nuts at times, but not the “p” word. 🙂
Nov 20, 2011 @ 13:21:23
I dated a “40”!
Nov 20, 2011 @ 11:32:36
Sorry, Pal. You just read the Cliff Notes version of the book. 😉
Nov 20, 2011 @ 11:31:16
I had the same reaction in reading a number of them, but only in reference to some people I know…;)
Nov 20, 2011 @ 11:08:50
Oh dear…just read number 4. I think I may be in trouble.
Nov 20, 2011 @ 08:00:32
Oh no – a test! Gee, I sure hope I don’t have to study too much. It took me six weeks to study for the urine test I had to take. This one sounds a lot tougher! Is there a Cliff Notes version of the book?